1. Adam, S. 2004. Using Learning Outcomes: A Consideration of the Nature, Role, Application and Implications for European Education of Employing “Learning Outcomes” at the Local, National and International Levels. United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, 1-2 July 2004, Heriot-Watt University (Edinburgh Conference Centre), Edinburgh.


2. Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R.   (eds.) 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.


3. Biggs, J. 1995. Assessing for learning: Some dimensions underlying new approaches to educational assessment. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41(1). 1-17.


4. Bloom, B.  (ed.) 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1, Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co.


5. Brown, S. & Race, P. 2013. Using Effective Assessment to Promote Learning. In Hunt, L. & Chalmers, D. (eds.)  2013. University teaching in focus: a Learning-centred Approach.  Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research and Routledge Press. 74-91.


6. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. 2012) A three dimensional model of learning outcomes in the Cognitive Domain. Iowa City: Iowa University Press. Available: [15 April 2019].


7. Chan, C. 2010. Assessment: Blooms’ Taxonomy, Assessment Resources @HKU.  Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong. Available: [21 November 2018].


8. Dave, R. H. 1970.  Psychomotor Levels. In, Armstrong, R. J. (ed.)  1970. Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives. Tucson, Arizona:  Educational Innovators Press.


9.   Dávila, A. 2017.  Review of: Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. 2005. Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J., 19(1). 140-142.


10. Gosling, D. & Moon, J. 2001. How to write learning outcomes and assessment criteria. London: SEEC Office, University of East London.


11. Harrow, A.J. 1972. A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. New York, David McKay Co.


12. Hugo, W.  2015. Boundaries of the Educational Imagination. Somerset West:  African Minds.   Available:  [15 April 2019].


13. Kennedy, D., Hyland, A. & Ryan, N. 2007. Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide.  Available:  Accessed [15 April 2019].


14. Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice 41(4). Columbus: College of Education, The Ohio State University: Ebsco Publishing.


15. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Co.


16. Morshead, R. W. 1965. On Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain. Studies in Philosophy and Education 4(1): 164-170. Available:  [15 April 2019].


17. Owen Wilson, L. (2016) Anderson and Krathwohl: Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised. Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy.  Available at  [15 April 2019].


18. Purser, L. 2003. Recognition issues in the Bologna Process: Conclusions and Recommendations. In S. Bergan (ed.) Recognition issues in the Bologna Process. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.   23-31).


19. Rothwell, W. J. & Kazanas, H.C. 1992, Mastering the Instructional Design Process: A Systematic Approach. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.


20. Simpson E. J. .1972. The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.


21. Spady, W. 1994. Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers.  Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators. 


22. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J.  2005. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Available:  [15 April 2019].