Wildlife institutions highly salient to human attitudes toward wildlife
Efforts to promote human-wildlife coexistence may be overly focused on wildlife-related costs and benefits... Respondents who agreed with the rules governing wildlife were 30-times more likely to have positive attitudes. This new and important finding highlights the possibility that institutions that address environmental justice, including the devolution of wildlife to local communities, may be more salient than the conventional measures of costs and benefits for understanding human-wildlife coexistence. Our results suggest that much more attention should be dedicated to the role of local institutions in promoting human-wildlife coexistence.
Merz, L., Pienaar, E. F., Fik, T., Muyengwa, S., & Child, B. (2023). Wildlife institutions highly salient to human attitudes toward wildlife. Conservation Science and Practice, e12879.
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12879
Authors
-
Leandra Merz et al
We support the free flow of information. Please share:
Form coming soon
Related Content
-
-
The Zambian Wildlife Ranching Industry: Scale, Associated Benefits, and Limitations Affecting Its Development
ByPeter Lindsey et alarrow_forward2013 -
The Trade in Wildlife: A Framework to Improve Biodiversity and Livelihood Outcomes
ByRosie Cooney et alarrow_forward2015
Get updates by email
In a complex and changing world, AWEI generates strategic ideas, conducts independent analysis on wildlife economies, and collaborates with global scholar-practitioners to provide training and expertise for biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, and inclusive economic opportunities in Africa.
Sign up for a quarterly dose of AWEI insights
In a complex and changing world, AWEI generates strategic ideas, conducts independent analysis on wildlife economies, and collaborates with global scholar-practitioners to provide training and expertise for biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, and inclusive economic opportunities in Africa.