Wild assumptions? Questioning simplistic narratives about consumer preferences for wildlife products
27 July 2020
With increasing attention being paid to the growing challenges associated with the illegal wildlife trade, it is vital that we do not jump to inappropriate conclusions on the best way to address it—this includes avoiding simplistic assessments of the conservation impacts of wildlife farming.
Research
Hinsley, A, 't Sas‐Rolfes, M. Wild assumptions? Questioning simplistic narratives about consumer preferences for wildlife products. People Nat. 2020; 00: 1– 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10099
Authors
-
Mr Michael 't Sas-Rolfes
Postgraduate Fellow -
Amy Hinsley
We support the free flow of information. Please share:
More content
-
Collaborative governance models of wild product value chains for conservation and livelihood resilience
Mr Thapelo Brilliant LebopaArticles -
-
-
-
South Africa’s conservation model: why expanding the use of biodiversity to generate money is a good idea
Dr Hayley Clements…Articles -
Natural capital as a potential tool for resolving human-wildlife conflict
Dr Michael MusgraveArticles -
-
Systematic review of the impact of restrictive wildlife trade measures on conservation of iconic species in southern Africa
Christina Hiller…2024Research -
Get updates by email
In a complex and changing world, AWEI generates strategic ideas, conducts independent analysis on wildlife economies, and collaborates with global scholar-practitioners to provide training and expertise for biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, and inclusive economic opportunities in Africa.
Sign up for a quarterly dose of AWEI insights
In a complex and changing world, AWEI generates strategic ideas, conducts independent analysis on wildlife economies, and collaborates with global scholar-practitioners to provide training and expertise for biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, and inclusive economic opportunities in Africa.